Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÇϾǰúµÎÀÇ °ñÁõ½Äü Æò°¡¿¡ À־ transmaxillary ÃÔ¿µ¹ý°ú transcranial ÃÔ¿µ¹ýÀÇ ºñ±³

COMPARISON OF TRANSMAXILLARY AND TRANSCRANIAL PROJECTION IN THE EVALUATION OF OSTEOPHYTES OF MANDIBULAR CONDYLES

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1989³â 19±Ç 1È£ p.123 ~ 136
·ù»ï¿­, ÀÌûÈñ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
·ù»ï¿­ (  ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³
ÀÌûÈñ (  ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐ

Abstract

¿ä ¾à
5°³ÀÇ °ÇÁ¶µÎ°³°ñÀÇ ÇϾǰúµÎ¿¡ ÀÎÀ§ÀûÀ¸·Î °ñÁõ½Äü¸¦ Çü¼ºÇÑ ÈÄ ¼öÁ÷°¢ 25¡£, ¼öÆò°¢ 0
¡£¸¦ ºÎ¿©ÇÑ transcranialÃÔ¿µ¹ý°ú µÎºÎ±Ô°Ý ¹æ»ç¼± ÃÔ¿µ±â¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ transmaxillaryÃÔ¿µ¹ýÀ»
½ÃÇàÇÏ¿© ¾òÀº 90¸ÅÀÇ transcranial ¹× 45¸ÅÀÇ transmaxillary¹æ»ç¼±»çÁøÀ» ÅëÇØ ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº
°á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. TranscranialÃÔ¿µ¹ý¿¡¼­ °ñÁõ½Äü°¡ ÇϾǰúµÎÀÇ »óÁߺο¡ ÀÖÀ»¶§ Æ󱸽ÿ¡ °üÂûÀÌ ¿ëÀÌ
ÇÏ¿´À¸³ª(p<0.05), ±× ÀÌ¿ÜÀÇ ºÎÀ§¿¡¼­´Â Åë°èÇÐÀûÀÎ À¯ÀǼºÀÌ ¾ø¾ú´Ù(p>0.05).
2. °ñÁõ½Äü°¡ ÇϾǰúµÎÀÇ ³»ºÎ ¹× ÁߺÎ(p<0.05)¿¡ À§Ä¡ÇÏ¿´À» ¶§´Â transmaxillaryÃÔ¿µ¹ý
¿¡¼­ °üÂûÀÌ ´õ ¿ëÀÌÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ¿ÜºÎ¿¡ À§Ä¡ÇÏ¿´À» ¶§´Â Åë°èÇÐÀûÀÎ À¯ÀǼºÀÌ ¾ø¾ú´Ù(p>0.05)
3. °ñÁõ½Äü°¡ ÇϾǰúµÎÀÇ »ó¹æ(p<0.05) ¹× ÈĹæ(p<0.01)¿¡ À§Ä¡ÇÏ¿´À» ¶§´Â
transmaxillaryÃÔ¿µ¹ý¿¡¼­ °üÂûÀÌ ´õ ¿ëÀÌÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç Àü¹æ¿¡ À§Ä¡ÇÏ¿´À» ¶§´Â Åë°èÇÐÀûÀÎ À¯
ÀǼºÀÌ ¾ø¾ú´Ù(p>0.05)
4. TranscranialÃÔ¿µ¹ý¿¡¼­´Â °ñÁõ½Äü°¡ ÇϾǰúµÎÀÇ Ãø¹æÀ¸·Î À§Ä¡ÇÒ¼ö·Ï(p<0.01),
transmaxillary ÃÔ¿µ¹ý¿¡¼­´Â ÈĹæÀ¸·Î À§Ä¡ÇÒ¼ö·Ï(p<0.05) °üÂûÀÌ ¿ëÀÌÇÏ¿´´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The purpose of this study was to decide the diagnostic value of transmaxillary and
transcranial projection in the evaluation of mandibular condyles.
Five dry skulls with intact anatomic structure were selected for this study and the
artificial osteophytes were attached to 9 different areas of the mandibular condyle.
Ninety transcranial and forty-five transmaxillary radiographs were taken and then the
radiographs were evaluated three times.
The results were as follows.
In transcranial radiographs, superoeentral osteophyte was easily observed in closing
state than in opening state (p<0.05). But there were no significant differences in other
locations(p>0.05).
The osteophytes on the medial and central portion were easily observed at the
transmaxillary projection than transcranial projection(p<0.05), but there was no
significant difference on the lateral portion(p>0.05).
The osteophytes on the superior (p<0.01) and posterior (p<0.01) portion were easily
observed at the transmaxillary projection than transcranial projection, but there was no
significant difference on the anterior portion (p>0.05).
The more laterally located osteophytes (p<0.01) at the transcranial projections were
easily observed.
The more posteriorly located osteophytes (p<0.05) at the transmaxillary projections
were easily observed.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸